The Objectivity of Judicial Decisions: A Comparative Analysis of Nine Jurisdictions
BookThis item doesn’t have any media yet
2016 | Law
This book discusses how judges qualify their activities as objective. The data for this project was retrieved from a large sample of cases using Langacker's methodology. The sample included over a thousand decisions from Brazil, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Romania and the UK. The decisions considered allegations of judicial bias, unfairness, and injustice. Pre-judices are shared cognitive methods that legal practitioners perceive as necessary. The results of the study directly confirm Pierre Legrand's claims of pre-judices in legal discourse, and as corollary, Jules L. Coleman and Brian Leiter's idea of modest objectivity in law.
Related Items:
Published by | Peter Lang AG |
Edition | Unknown |
ISBN | 9783631675908 |
Language | N/A |
Images And Data Courtesy Of: Peter Lang AG.
This content (including text, images, videos and other media) is published and used in accordance
with Fair Use.