Beauty and the Beast
Show
Beauty and the Beast is a musical with music by Alan Menken, lyrics by Howard Ashman and Tim Rice,...
Clear Vision 2
Games
App
The follow up to the #1 Sniper game on the App Store worldwide has arrived! 17+ NOT SUITABLE FOR...
Crazy Frog
YouTube Channel
The OFFICIAL YouTube Channel for Crazy Frog - everyone's lovely animated annoying thing !!! ...
ACTUALLY HAPPENED
YouTube Channel
ACTUALLY HAPPENED is a digital platform that gives people the chance to have their personal stories...
Disney Manga: Tim Burton's the Nightmare Before Christmas
Book
Jack Skellington is the Pumpkin King, the ruler of Halloween Town and master of all things creepy...
Senjutsu by Iron Maiden
Album
Parlophone Records is thrilled to announce the release of IRON MAIDEN’s 17th studio album...
Ashley Valencia (5 KP) rated Beauty and the Beast (2017) in Movies
Apr 13, 2019
I knew we were in trouble when Emma Watson started her first song of the film HEAVILY autotuned. The practice used to be that if an actor couldnt sing, they would lip sync and have someone else do the singing voice. This was also common practice for the animated films, one actor for singing and another for spoken lines. I wish they would've gone this route. The autotuning is just so heavy I found it cringey.
The film is gorgeous, a lot of pleasing visuals and effects but the Beast just looks, strange. Not really animalistic. Honestly more like if his face was carved out of a tree.
Despite the singing issue I do think the cast was well chosen. They all do a good job with what they have. Especially the actor playing Gaston. It seemed clear that they weren't 100% sure what to do with the character. At a few points it seemed like they were going to try to make him sympathetic but then they'd fall back on him just being awful. Still the actor did an amazing job and really sold it.
For the most part the plot sticks close to the original film though there are a few new elements, some background on Belle's mom, and new songs.
A few weeks before the film's release the director announced that there was definitely a gay character in the film. There are a few implications that there might be but that's it. I think honestly it would've come across better, he would've been given more credit, if he'd just let it be instead of making a big announcement and patting himself on the back. It would've seemed like a subtle nod to the lgbtq community instead of the false disappointing promise it turned out to be. He wanted the credit without actually putting in the work and it shows.
Overall I just didn't care for it. It's fine. Nothing spectacular. The animated film was definitely better. So I'd say stick with the classic however it is worth watching just to see the different interpretation of the story.
If you want a live action version I would recommend La Belle et la Bete, the 2014 French-Germanic version instead. It's a more interesting and visually stunning version of the story.