Smashbomb

Search

Search results

All (1473)

Content

Grandma's Kitchen

Education and Games

(0 Ratings) Rate It

App

Cook up fun and learning in Grandma's Kitchen! Bake together some compound words, snatch healthy...

The How to be British Collection

Martyn Ford and Peter Legon

(0 Ratings) Rate It

Book

A perennially popular collection of colour cartoon illustrations, with accompanying texts, on the...

Tra câu Việt - Anh

Reference and Education

(0 Ratings) Rate It

App

CHÀO MỪNG BẠN ĐẾN VỚI TRA CÂU - CÔNG CỤ TÌM KIẾM CẶP CÂU SONG NGỮ ANH VIỆT...

Emma @ The Movies (1786 KP) rated Mile 22 (2018) in Movies

Sep 25, 2019

Mile 22 (2018)

2018 | Action

5.8

(12 Ratings)

Movie Rating

Contains spoilers, click to show

With a run time of 1 hour 34 minutes, and such a fast flowing story line, you certainly don't feel like you're bored at any point during Mile 22. There were plenty of times where I was confused, and a couple where I was amused, but never bored.

Overall the story is a good one and I felt like the twists and turns come in just the right places. But there's no denying that this could have been a 4/5 star film for me had there been some differences.

The opening titles set about cataloging Silva's (Mark Wahlberg) personal history so that we know what sort of person he is and how he's ended up at the head of this team. While it actually worked well I'm unsure of why it was needed at all. Most of the traits that were being shown are ones that frequently pop up in movies in the stereotypical spec ops/military characters, they needed no explanation. Similarly, the back story for Alice seemed surplus to requirements and shoe-horned in so she could have something for Silva to get angry about. Although later in the film she uses the back story to manipulate a baddie when she's cornered and that was quite amusing so I'm willing to let it slide.

By far the best thing about this movie is Iko Uwais. At all times he's consistent to character and his fight scenes were incredible. So it's a little sad that they were marred by some terrible editing. Many of the scenes would flow nicely and you were just becoming engrossed in them when they would cut abruptly to another angle. The only thing it seemed to achieve was speeding up the action, which was already fast and going along very nicely on it's own in the first place. The cuts were chaotic and difficult to watch and ruined what could have been the redeeming feature of this film.

During the film you see Silva talking about the events at some kind of briefing. Although short, they felt like ramblings and didn't make much sense. Placing one "present day" scene at either end of the main events would have achieved a much better job and covered up what felt like a script that had gone awry.

The ending felt like a bit of a cop out to me. Not answering the main question that we were all looking for left me with a deeply unsatisfying feeling and some annoyance at what felt like an obvious attempt to set up for a sequel.

I was surprised to see that this was an 18 certificate. After sitting through the whole thing I feel like it could have quite happily sat at the 15 level. All it would have needed was the removal of a lot of unnecessary language and to have some of the more graphic scenes shot from a different angle/cut better to not show so much of the brutality. That being said though, I didn't find the violence particularly bad compared to other things I've seen.

As an after thought having just rewatched the trailer again before putting it into this post... it's a shame that there weren't some of the computer erasure effects from the trailer in the film. There were certainly opportunities and with the level of technology that they're using it seems to be down played at almost all points.

What should you do?

Watch it for Iko Uwais. His action sequences were so good that they hold up the rest of the film.

Movie thing you wish you could take home

I could really do with the Hand of God when I'm out and about driving.