data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bce0/1bce010a2118c14679b882fb3502d13356991f90" alt="100 All-Time Favorite Movies"
100 All-Time Favorite Movies
Book
Take a journey through the makers and shapers of celluloid history. From horror to romance, noir to...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6d0d/b6d0de7d19692bd04d597818533e2f1e80802723" alt="Nordic Genre Film: Small Nation Film Cultures in the Global Marketplace"
Nordic Genre Film: Small Nation Film Cultures in the Global Marketplace
Pietari Kaapa, Tommy Gustafsson and Outi Hakola
Book
Offers a transnational comparative approach to contemporary popular Nordic genre film. Nordic Genre...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8de4/f8de4d61a7b9c8b3f2bfe5411fc638f7102eb681" alt="40x40"
Michael Korda recommended Sweet Smell of Success (1957) in Movies (curated)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4e04/e4e047946ed60487ec0ceecc955175c551f2155e" alt="The Third Man (1949)"
The Third Man (1949)
Movie
The Third Man is a 1949 British film noir directed by Carol Reed and written by Graham Greene....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a72f/7a72f4a4da3f0a19c18afe1c95859258d8c8d2a5" alt="40x40"
Richard Hell recommended Leon Morin, Priest (1961) in Movies (curated)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d569a/d569af00853cf605442921b1b59dcf13ea02983b" alt="40x40"
Phil Rosenthal recommended Sweet Smell of Success (1957) in Movies (curated)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cc92/9cc9277acab6d46c5538f28c716a33a368b4d148" alt="The Big Sleep (1946)"
The Big Sleep (1946)
Movie
Philip Marlowe is a private detective who is hired by a wealthy general to resolve some debts, only...
Hardboiled Hard-boiled Raymond Chandler Vivian Rutledge Sternwood
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f3b2/6f3b2276206e30847a64f7916b497438f8a8205e" alt="40x40"
Andy K (10823 KP) rated Blade Runner (1982) in Movies
Jul 24, 2019
The art direction and cinematography are almost unmatched even under today's standards and then consider this movie is from 1982 and it is just astonishing. I won't argue with someone who says the film is slow developing or style or substance; however, I do not consider that a negative whatsoever. Consider it just another way to tell a story. Why do movies always have to follow the same formula to be considered a acceptable?
It is hard to believe the film only managed US box office of $27 million upon its original theatrical release. It's cult status was almost immediate along with the rise of home video and eventually DVD. The various cuts of the film and the vast and minor differences between them can make the meaning of the film quite different depending on how you interpret it.
The argument whether or not Deckard is a replicant could really depend on which version of the film you have seen or what you choose to believe.
Nevertheless, the film still stands the test of time as a sci fi classic and one of the most visually stunning films ever made!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84bd5/84bd525be86b0af5e9e26b534d8acd160a5f64aa" alt="Destination London: German-speaking Emigres and British Cinema, 1925-1950"
Destination London: German-speaking Emigres and British Cinema, 1925-1950
Tim Bergfelder and Christian Cargnelli
Book
The legacy of emigres in the British film industry, from the silent film era until after the Second...