Resilient Cities: Overcoming Fossil-Fuel Dependence
Timothy Beatley, Peter Newman and Heather Boyer
Book
What does it mean to be a resilient city in the age of a changing climate and growing inequity? As...
Oxygen
Book
With the compassion of Jodi Picoult and the medical realism of Atul Gawande, Oxygen is a riveting...
Prepare for Anything (Outdoor Life): 338 Essential Skills
Book
Are you preparing for the collapse of society? Concerned about making it through the next category 4...
LeftSideCut (3776 KP) rated 2012 (2009) in Movies
Sep 12, 2019 (Updated Oct 25, 2019)
The above mentioned spectacle is very formulaic here, as crazy set piece is followed by crazy set piece, complimented with in between scenes of a just-doing-it-for-the-pay-check John Cusack, and his exceptionally boring family (who all somehow manage to be in the exact place of disasters kicking off multiple times).
The scenes of mayhem themselves are laced with Benny Hill-esque antics, and silly dialogue that instantly removes any tension.
As our band of irritatingly mundane survivors trudge through our planet literally cracking apart, they come across a host of 'wacky' characters, who all seem to be jostling for the part of comic relief (not every character needs to be comic relief Roland). And I really wanted pretty much everyone of these characters to just hurry up and get killed by a tornado or whatever.
I did however quite enjoy Woody Harrelson's batshit crazy conspiracy theorist and his gratuitous pickle eating.
It's also always nice to see the likes of Thandie Newton and Chiwetel Ejiofor, even if they're not given much to do here but look all serious.
The CGI is just about starting to age at this point but is still mostly passable, and they're are some pretty memorable visuals here and there.
Overall though 2012 is pretty awful and really not as fun as it thinks it is.
Earthquakes Pro
Weather and News
App
Earthquake! is a quake application that based on multiple data sources. With this app, you can get...
Earthquakes - Latest & Alert
Weather and News
App
Earthquake! is a quake application that based on multiple data sources. With this app, you can get...
Heather Cranmer (2721 KP) created a post
May 28, 2020
Marked Yours (Sentries #1)
Book
When one society fell, assaulted by natural disaster, in its place rose another, molded into...
Action Adventure Science Fiction Futuristic MM Romance
JT (287 KP) rated Hereafter (2010) in Movies
Mar 10, 2020
Having worked with Damon on Invictus Eastwood brought him in for this, as George Lonegan a man with the gift of being able to talk to people that have passed to the other side. The opening half an hour is an intense watch as we watch De France’s reporter get caught up in a terrible Tsunami while holidaying with her boyfriend. It’s a well shot natural disaster which Roland Emmerich himself would have been proud.
Damon himself battling not to use his ‘gift’ despite the ongoing pressures from his brother, chooses of all things a cooking class as a method of escapism. There he meets Melanie (Bryce Dallas Howard) and the two form a bond, to which George ruins by accepting to perfrom a reading which doesn’t go as well as hoped.
I wanted to see her come back at some point during the film, but alas she doesn’t which was a disappointment as Howard was one of the few shining lights. The third part of the story, all of which interlock into each other, follow British twins Marcus and Jason. Two of the worst child actors I think I have ever seen, one can imagine that is from lack of experience.
With one of the boys dying in a freak accident the lone brother goes on a journey of his own, of which brings him closer to eventual contact with George. The film tries to be deep and meaningful about what happens to people who suffer death experiences, but its way off Eastwood’s sharp and cool direction – a shame when it started so brightly.
Shigeru Ban
Heidi Zuckerman Jacobson, Claude Bruderlein and Shigeru Ban
Book
"Architects are not building temporary housing because we are too busy building for the privileged...


