Jane's Hotel 2: Family Hero HD
Games and Entertainment
App
Restore your family chain of hotels in this sequel to the famous strategy game. After building her...
Cover Orange 2: Journey
Games
App
YOUR FAVORITE ORANGES ARE BACK! Revisit Cover Orange in this completely new and juicy sequel made...
Dead Ahead: Zombie Warfare
Games
App Watch
Confront and defy the evil undead in this new tactical survival sequel of Dead Ahead! Fight for...
Neanderthal Marries Human
10.0
Rate It
Book
There are three things you should know about Quinn Sullivan: 1) He is madly in love with Janie...
Truth (Consequences, #2)
10.0
Rate It
Book
From New York Times and USA Today bestselling author Aleatha Romig comes the thrilling sequel in the...
Near and Far
8.4
Rate It
Tabletop Game
Four wanderers search for the Last Ruin, a city that legends say contains an artifact that will...
Boardgames StoryGames LaukatGames
HeroQuest Advanced Quest
7.5
Rate It
Tabletop Game
Advanced Heroquest was a 1989 sequel to HeroQuest, published by Games Workshop. Changes from...
Journey to Territory M (Extinction of All Children #2)
Book
Emma Whisperer’s journey continues in this sequel to the Extinction series. Emma, the last...
David McK (3814 KP) rated Batman: Revolution in Books
Nov 30, 2025
I also had to keep reminding myself that 1995's Batman Forever (and even the later - and woeful - Batman & Robin) are not considered part of the same universe, despite both still featuring Michael Gough as Alfred Pennyworth, Bruce Wayne's faithful butler who is in on the secret.
In particular, 95's Batman Forever (which was Val; Kilmer's sole outing on the cape) features Jim Carrey as The Riddler, one of the two main villains of that film.
And also the main villain of this (albeit not Jim Carrey's manic version!).
This also brings back the reporter Alexander Knox - who has a larger role here than in the previous novel - and has a pre-Catwoman Selina Kyle having a larger(ish) role in the proceedings, alongside Max Schreck and his son Chip.
I *think* that may be why I didn't gel as much with this entry as the previous - namely, that I couldn;t get Jim Carrey's version of The Riddler out of my head the whole time I was reading this, despite knowing he's a very different take on the character than here.
That's not to say that this is a bad read, per se, - it's not, by any stretch of the imagination - just that I feel it may be better read 'cold', that is, without any pre-existing baggage. A hard sell in this day and age, I know!