Smashbomb

Search

Search results

All (2593)

Content

Measures - Unit Converter

Utilities and Reference

(0 Ratings) Rate It

App

Quickly convert between hundred of units and world currencies! Conversion are done much faster and...

Game Net for - Tiger Woods PGA Tour 14

Reference and Entertainment

(0 Ratings) Rate It

App

Travel back in time and walk onto the course with Arnold Palmer, Jack Nicklaus, Gary Player, and...

Andrew Thomas (363 KP) rated Trancers III: Deth Lives (1992) in Movies

Jul 26, 2020 (Updated Jul 26, 2020)

Trancers III: Deth Lives (1992)

1992 | Action, Horror, Mystery

5.5

(4 Ratings)

Movie Rating

It brings the overall story to a conclusion. (0 more)

Kind of boring compared to the previous 2. (0 more)

Cheesy B-grade videostore goodness.

Contains spoilers, click to show

I purchased all three of what I have nicknamed the Lena Trilogy out of pure curiosity. I'd walked past the Trancers movies in my local videostore numerous times in years past but never took the plunge. Finally I decided to give em a try because of nostalgia and because I learned that Helen Hunt was in them. The first Trancers I enjoyed, the second film was a little all over the place for me but it was still fun. Trancers 3 was a bit of a let down.

The Jack/Lena romance comes to a dissatisfying end...a romance I was never rooting for to begin with considering that the time travel angle makes it an incestuous relationship. The story teases a return to the post-apocalyptic future of Angel City, but it's only a quick stop off before heading back to the 1990s. The idea of witnessing the origins of the Trancer threat was tantalizing in theory, but it comes across as a bad Captain America rip off. Plus the absence of Art LaFleur as Jack's future boss McNulty leaves out an important element of what made the first 2 movies fun. Bottom line, Trancers 3 let me down, but I don't regret watching it. If you are able to enjoy the first 2 films you might like this one.