Introduction to Exercise Science
Terry J. Housh, Dona J. Housh and Glen O. Johnson
Book
The fifth edition of Introduction to Exercise Science introduces students to every core area of...
The Architecture of Use: Aesthetics and Function in Architectural Design
Stephen Grabow and Kent Spreckelmeyer
Book
By analyzing ten examples of buildings that embody the human experience at an extraordinary level,...
The Mobility Revolution: Zero Emissions, Zero Accidents, Zero Ownership
Book
A must-read for anyone interested in the future of the automobile industry, our cities, and the way...
Aleksandr Askoldov: The Commissar
Book
Filmed in1966 and '67, but kept from release for twenty years, The Commissar is unquestionably one...
BookwormLea (3034 KP) rated The Exorcist in Phoenix Theatre (London, United Kingdom) in Shows
Jul 16, 2020
What I also loved was how clever the stage setting was! It was all one set. Nothing moved or changed. It looked like a dollhouse and the only thing they did was switch the light on the room they were in. So clever and very effective!!! If you're ever in London, go see it!!!!
Texas Modern: Redefining Houses in the Lone Star State
Book
Forget the Texas you thought you once knew, put aside those cattle ropin' preconceptions and make...
Complete Arabic Beginner to Intermediate Book and Audio Course: Learn to Read, Write, Speak and Understand a New Language with Teach Yourself
7.0
Rate It
Book
Do you want to be able to speak, read and write Modern Standard Arabic confidently? This bestselling...
I do not agree with the main argument of this biography: that William Shakespeare was, in fact, only a pen name for Edward de Vere, the Earl of Oxford. No. I do not agree with this claim, like so many other Shakespeare scholars and lovers because the "facts" put forth are just very thinly stretched ideas and concepts that cannot be proven.
This book, instead of pushing me to think about how this fact could even possibly be true, is more about the life of Edward de Vere and how some of the circumstances in his life would be able to loosely connect to the plays Shakespeare had written. In tying in the plays, Anderson thinks he is making a stronger claim for his argument, but is honestly just trying to connect things that are unalike to "prove" what he is thinking. As an English major, I don't really like that way of thinking much.
Most of what he was trying to argue could have been left out and, instead, just have the appendices left in there. In the approximately sixty pages of the four appendices, he stated what over three hundred pages could not. No, I do not agree with the argument he is making, but it seems like it is stronger and more coherent in the appendix.
I want to point out a specific quotation from the Appendix A on page 381 to make a point about this book. It states: The thesis of this book, the "Oxfordian" proposition that Edward de Vere was Shake-speare, is a theory built on circumstantial evidence. There is no single "smoking gun" document that leads one inexorably to the conclusion that de Vere wrote Hamlet, King Lear, the Sonnets, etc." I understand that it is difficult to try to prove a theory that many argue against (myself included), but basing your argument solely on circumstantial evidence is not the way to go. It makes the argument, at least to me, seem less realistic and, in all honesty, difficult to agree with. If you cannot prove someone is guilty solely based on circumstantial evidence, you should not try to prove a complex argument that a famous playwright was not a real person, but, in fact, a pseudonym for another historical figure around the same time.
The "facts" that de Vere's life has similar qualities to the plays written by Shakespeare leading to the thought that de Vere, himself, is Shakespeare is a stretch, and not a convincing one at that.
Overall, I did not enjoy this book and I did not find it convincing at all. It felt more like a history lesson about the background of Edward de Vere rather than any kind of argument towards the idea that he could have been Shakespeare.
In my heart of hearts, I will always believe that William Shakespeare was, in fact, a real man by the name of William Shakespeare, not some made up name for a man who wanted to keep his private life separate from the public.
Adulting: How to Become a Grown-up in 468 Easy(ish) Steps
10.0
Rate It
Book
Sign up My Books Browse ▾ Community ▾ Book cover for Adulting: How to Become a Grown-up in...
Self help nonfiction advice growing up adulting
Hearing from God Each Morning
Book and Education
App
In the hustle and bustle of today's busy world, sometimes it's hard enough to hear yourself think,...