Smashbomb

Search

Search results

All (5000)

Content

MCSE 70-687 Cert Guide: Configuring Microsoft Windows 8.1

Don Poulton, Randy Bellet and Harry Holt

(0 Ratings) Rate It

Book

The study guide helps you master all the topics on the MCSA 70-687 exam, including the following: *...

Best of Fragments from France

Bruce Bairnsfather, Tonie Holt and Valmai Holt

(0 Ratings) Rate It

Book

Bruce Bairnsfather (BB) was the most famous cartoonist of the First World War and his soldier...

Brooks's, 1764-2014: The Story of a Whig Club

Hugh Johnson, John Ingamells, Philipp Ziegler and Charles Sebag-Montefiore

(0 Ratings) Rate It

Book

One of the many aspects of London that never failed to attract comment from foreign visitors in the...

Emma @ The Movies (1786 KP) rated Bad Times at the El Royale (2018) in Movies

Sep 25, 2019

What can I say about this one? I left the cinema pondering. I'm still pondering this morning trying to work out what to score it. I wasn't bored, yet I wasn't enthralled. It felt long, but not too long. I could follow the story lines, but some of them didn't quite make sense... It's definitely a contender for Goldilocks of the Year.

I was keen on watching this after seeing the trailer. A star studded cast and an intriguing idea really is all you need to hook people in. I can't decide (I know, it's happening a lot this review) if the trailer gave too much away. Could they have kept more elements back as a surprise? Possibly that wouldn't have left such a sense of anticipation about the film.

Being set in 1969 we're obviously given a lot of classic tunes through the jukebox and singing of Darlene Sweet. The latter is goosebump inducing at times and magical to listen to.

The way this movie is told is very reminiscent of a lot of things to me. I was getting flashes of Kill Bill and Lost, and as Drew Goddard was involved with Lost that's probably not a coincidence. The scenario also made me think of the 2003 film Identity and an episode of Criminal Minds called Paradise.

I enjoyed seeing each person's journey that led them up to the El Royale. You feel much more involved in the story because you switch allegiances between the characters every time you see a new perspective. It also gives you just enough of teaser to something that's going to happen to draw you further in.

The use of intertitle cards felt a little out of place, it's not really a sixties thing and the style of them didn't seem to fit with the film itself. They do their job which is to say "now for a bit of back story on this person" but looking a little less silent movie and a little more El Royale wouldn't have gone amiss.

A whole section of story line seemed to have no conclusion, for reasons that will be partly obvious to you when you see the film. What I can't work out is if I missed something about it that would have left me less confused. This movie could definitely do with a second watch.

What you should do

I'd probably recommend watching this one at home on DVD or streaming with a bunch of movie friends. It feels like it needs discussing more than watching.

You should also probably watch this gif a lot. I'm only sorry that I can't find a longer version without other distractions in it... like the rest of the film.

Movie thing you wish you could take home

I'd quite like the El Royale to live in. Although I think I'd convert the spying corridor into a regular corridor and make the whole place a home rather than a playground for snooping and murder.