Deborah (162 KP) rated Mistress of Rome (The Empress of Rome, #1) in Books
Dec 21, 2018
The narrative in the book is a bit odd and it took a little while for me to get used to it. Large chunks are in the first person, mainly from one of the two main female characters. This sometimes would get confussing when switching between the two, especially when these two characters are together, early in the novel. The text will then switch back into a third person narrative. Overall I think Quinn has made this narrative device work quite well, it just takes a bit of getting used to.
The character of Lepida is through and through nasty, with not a single redeeming characteristic, so while one is happy to see her meet Nemesis (did the Roman's have an equivalent?!) she is really a bit of a one-dimentional character.
There is a note at the end of the book which explains a little more about what is historical fact and what is taking a bit of a liberty; that's the sort of thing that I do like in an historical novel - I think it's helpful.
I found this a gripping, hard-to-put-down read, although it's pretty violently, both in the fighting and the sexual stakes; not one for the squeamish!
The novel covers the reign of Henry VIII from the point of view of Will Somers, the man who becomes the king's jester or fool. This gives the book a totally different twist and insight from something concentrating on the usual courtly suspects. Will is in the thick of things, with a front row seat in the course of history, if you like, but he's not one of the players in the drama.
The novel is actually written in the first person, and it's very rarely that I like this because in the hands of most authors it is clunky, but here I had to go back and check that this was so, as it seemed so natural.
Obviously, hindsight is a wonderful thing in history and some of the points made are from the point of view of someone with historical hindsight, but there's also a lot of psychological truth in there and you can quite clearly see why characters act the way they do.
Now, my only problem is that MCB was not a writer of authorial afterwords, like many present authors. What I really want to know is how much of the story is true (within the bounds of fictional probability!) and what is fiction/surmise - and what happened to Will Somers next?!
Lending to the Borrower from Hell: Debt, Taxes, and Default in the Age of Philip II
Mauricio Drelichman and Hans-Joachim Voth
Book
Why do lenders time and again loan money to sovereign borrowers who promptly go bankrupt? When can...
The Book of Revelation For Dummies
Richard Wagner and Larry R. Helyer
Book
Are you baffled by the Book of Revelation? Understand the purpose, key themes, and symbolism of the...
The Prologues on Easter of Theophilus of Alexandria and [Cyril]
Book
The Letter and Prologue on Easter of Theophilus of Alexandria (385-412), the 95-year list of Paschal...
Understanding Scientific Understanding
Book
It is widely acknowledged that a central aim of science is to achieve understanding of the world...
Routledge Handbook on the Global History of Nursing NIP
Patricia D'Antonio, Julie A. Fairman and Jean C. Whelan
Book
A CHOICE Outstanding Academic Title 2014! 2014 winner of the American Association for the History of...
Trees, Woods and Forests: A Social and Cultural History
Book
Throughout human history our relationship with trees, woods and forests has remained central to the...
The Fortifications of Arkadian City-States in the Classical and Hellenistic Periods
Book
This illustrated study comprises a comprehensive and detailed account of the historical development...
Machine Art in the Twentieth Century
Book
"Machine art" is neither a movement nor a genre, but encompasses diverse ways in which artists...
