Smashbomb

Search

Search results

All (3612)

Content

Paradise Lost by John Milton

(0 Ratings) Rate It

Podcast

Magnificent in its scale and scope, this monumental poem by the blind poet John Milton was the first...

The Oxford English Literary History: Volume 1: 1000-1350: Conquest and Transformation

Laura Ashe

(0 Ratings) Rate It

Book

The Oxford English Literary History is the new century's definitive account of a rich and diverse...

Healing Sexually Betrayed Men and Boys: Treatment for Sexual Abuse, Assault, and Trauma

Richard B. Gartner

(0 Ratings) Rate It

Book

Healing Sexually Betrayed Men and Boys is the new authoritative source for treatment of men and boys...

BookwormMama14 (18 KP) rated Illustrated Stories From Shakespeare in Books

Jan 2, 2019

I recently purchased this book from Usborne and am SO in love with it! I have always had a deep appreciation and fascination with Shakespeare's work. (So much so that one year for Christmas all I wanted was Barnes & Noble's The Complete Works of William Shakespeare.) But I admit that at reading Shakespeare was a challenge when I was younger. Struggling to understand the language, I missed much of what was happening in the storyline. I am thrilled to have found this book for my kids. I thought, if they grow up knowing the stories, then maybe when it comes time to read the original plays, they will have an easier time. So far, my three year old LOVES this book! He has sat through Hamlet and was in high dudgeon that I had to borrow it to write this review. The illustrations are beautiful! And even though all of the plays are written so that young readers can understand them, some of the more famous lines from Shakespeare's works can still be found. I am thoroughly impressed and am so excited to introduce my kids to Shakespeare at a young age. Hoping to nurture and grow their love of literature.

Kudos

David McK (3414 KP) rated Dauntless (The Lost Fleet, #1) in Books

Jan 30, 2019

Dauntless (The Lost Fleet, #1)

Jack Campbell | 2006 | Science Fiction/Fantasy

8.0

(3 Ratings)

Book Rating

While I doubt this novel is going to win any awards for literature, I have to say that it is a good enough read: not brilliant, but not terrible either.

Written by a ex-navy man, it's easy to see the influnece of his career in the pages: this is 'real' science-fiction, not science-fantasy, with the space battles obeying the laws of physics as we know them. The plot outline is also somewhat remniscient of the new series of BattleStar Galactica, with a smaller rag-tag force being chased by a numerically superior foe. Ironically, this book was first released at around the same time as that series came on TV, with (in this edition) the author claiming that that WAS NOT an inspiration (in the interview at the end), as if he'd been thinking of BSG it woud've been the older series.

With the way the book opens I must also admit that, at first, I thought I'd missed something: the best corollary I can think of is as if the film Aliens (that's the one with the 'S') had started without the whole prologue of them finding Ripleys life pod: you'd be able to infer what had happened, but would be feeling a bit lost at first.

Kudos

Awix (3310 KP) rated The War of the Worlds in TV

Dec 2, 2019

The War of the Worlds

2019 | Drama, Sci-Fi

7.2

(36 Ratings)

TV Show Rating

Grisly non-adaptation of the immortal H.G. Wells story retains the same basic premise and the very occasional moment, but essentially scoops out the innards of the actual novel and replaces them with indescribably turgid attempts to (I would guess) update the story and make it relevant to the modern world.

Part of a grim tradition where BBC attempts to adapt SF, fantasy and horror classics operate to different standards than when they are tackling Austen or Dickens. If the team who perpetrated War of the Worlds got their hands on Pride and Prejudice, it would end up being a lesbian romance between the Bennets' maid and one of the minor daughters, performed on ice, with a frame story concerning the Boer war. It's not just that it does the book badly, it genuinely doesn't seem interested in it at all. Someone gets a leaden, clumsy speech articulating the subtext of the novel (how to adapt a great book for the hard-of-thinking) but as to what this version of the story is supposed to be about or why we should care at all... It takes real skill and determination to screw up a classic piece of literature quite this badly.