David Mitchell: Back Story
Book
David Mitchell, who you may know for his inappropriate anger on every TV panel show except Never...
Effigy: Vol 1 : Idle Worship
Book
* After a sex-tape scandal, former Hollywood child star turned Z-lister Chondra Jackson returns to...
Amazon Cloud Cam Security Camera
6.3
Rate It
Tech Watch
Stay connected 24/7 - Catch activities as they happen in 1080p Full HD. Watch, download, and share...
Four Parties and a Funeral
8.0
Rate It
Book
Agatha Award-winning author Maria DiRico returns with the fourth book in the Catering Hall Mystery...
Radio Times
Entertainment and Magazines & Newspapers
App
Radio Times magazine – the UK’s favourite guide to TV, film and radio listings is now on...
Video & TV Cast Pro for Chromecast: Stream Movies
Photo & Video and Utilities
App
Watch any web video or local video on your Chromecast 1+2+Ultra or Android TV powered television...
rova - stay tuned
Music and Entertainment
App
All of your favourite NZ radio stations streaming live, in one place. Polly & Grant are back,...
Kirk Bage (1775 KP) rated Making A Murderer - Season 1 in TV
Mar 3, 2020
What does make us want to know, and solve, and understand the worst criminal minds of the last century? Do we place ourselves as amateur sleuths and psychologists, so we can have our own opinions on a difficult subject, or do we just want to see the very worst of humanity to satisfy a need to be shocked? One thing for sure is that there is no end to this kind of docu-drama available, especially on Netflix, if we choose to stomach it.
I watched three recently in quick succession, and do feel like I have something to say about it…
First, was the extension of the Making A Murderer case of Steven Avery, which can be credited for re-imagining the scope of this kind of “reality” show on Netflix in late 2015. Without a doubt, the draw of the first series was in showing how corrupt, ambiguous and vague the American criminal system can be. We know this from circus shows such as the OJ Simpson case, that capture a curiosity in the public that must be explored and documented. There is no point in saying, no don’t do it, because eventually we have to know, and current forensic science and film techniques allow us to approach it. Carefully. Oh, so carefully!
In this case, the much criticised production extracts further detail from an undeniably fascinating case of criminal negligence and injustice, without ever providing a new revelation enough to definitively say we now know enough to put it to bed. It focuses largely on the power of Kathleen Zellner as a lawyer of impeccable motives and results to prove the innocence of convicted men.
What we then get is 10 episodes of contrivance that increasingly try to convince us further that this is a miscarriage of justice that must be addressed. The continual message is that there is a conspiracy here, which makes for good TV. Someone doesn’t want this show to have an influence. Who is covering up what? And why is the justice system adamant in disallowing the revelations this show throws up so regularly? In the end it becomes less about the victim and the crime, as an indictment of a process that does not want to be examined. The power of this show has always been that something is rotten in Denmark. But what exactly?
There is no doubt at all that once involved you have to keep watching. It is exceptionally presented, and therefore successful as an entertainment because of that. The complexity of the argument comes not in the real recordings of conversations and evidence, but in the form of presentation as a TV show. A question, I am certain, the film-makers themselves constantly ask. It is about finding “truth” for the families of the victims; a crusade that may or may not include individuals wrongly accused of a crime.