The Third Tower: Journeys in Italy
David Pearson, Antal Szerb and Len Rix
Book
A typically brilliant, ironic and moving travelogue by one of the twentieth century's greatest...
The Chilbury Ladies' Choir
Book
Read an exclusive interview with the author A warm, funny and big-hearted novel of...
Easter at the Villa Victoria
Book
It is 1995 and the Morton-Stewarts assemble at the 'Villa Victoria' in Antibes, which has been in...
Breach
Olumide Popoola and Annie Holmes
Book
In the refugee camp known as The Jungle an illusion is being disrupted: that of a neatly ordered...
Jesters_folly (230 KP) rated Llamageddon (2015) in Movies
May 15, 2021
The cast know that this film is not good but it looks like they had fun making it and it pays homage to a lot of other films, there are conversation on other films ala Scream, buckets of blood were-Llama transformation and alien eggs because these Lamas hatch from eggs that are laid by males.
If you haven't got a feel for Llamageddon yet then all you need to know is that it's mainly set around a party of teen's/young adults who drink, bonk, smoke and then get killed by the Llama, it's predictable, stupid and only 69 minutes long which is good because if it was any longer I think my brain would have melted and yes IMDB says that the run time is deliberate and that is the type of humour you can expect .
I really can't decide if Llamageddon is a waste of an hour or if it was actually a fun time, I think it rates some where between Zombeavers and the 2019 Wolf. Like Wolf it's very low budget and seems to be made more for the fun of the cast but, unlike wolf, it know this and doesn't take itself to serous. And that makes all the difference, not taking itself too serious makes the film a lot easier to watch.
So if you're looking of a quick watch and don't want to think about it too much you could give Llamageddon a watch, just don't expect to much.
Great Bales of Fire: More Tales of a Country Fireman
Book
More tales of a country fireman, from the author of ALL FIRED UP. Perfect for fans of Heartbeat or...
Kale and Coffee: A Renegade's Guide to Health, Happiness and Longevity
Book
After realizing that he may have a hereditary cancer risk, Kevin Gianni was intent on finding the...
The Upside of Downtime: Why Boredom is Good
Book
Are we living in an age where we are more boredom-prone? Or are other people boring us? Or could we...
Willpower For Dummies
Book
Develop rock-solid willpower with evidence-based techniques Willpower For Dummies shows you how to...
LeftSideCut (3776 KP) rated Thor: Ragnarok (2017) in Movies
Mar 5, 2021
One of my favourite working directors helming an MCU film is exciting indeed, and manages to deliver a film that injects new life into the Thor series, manages to fit in with other chapters of the franchise without feeling too alien, but still has liberal splashings of Waititi's trademark wit throughout.
The comedy in this entry is thick and fast, but everything lands just right. It's fair to say that it's taken a leaf out the Guardians of the Galaxy playbook, but manages to come across smoother and feel more refined in it's humour than Vol. 2.
Chris Hemsworth, Tom Hiddleston, Anthony Hopkins, Mark Ruffalo and Idris Elba are back and as good as ever with MCU newcomers Cate Blanchett, carving a memorable figure as this movies big bad Hela (who I really hope we see again at somepoint), Tessa Thompson as the badass Valkyrie, a wonderful Jeff Goldblum as secondary villain Grandmaster (another that I hope we see again), and Karl Urban as The Executioner. It's a well put together cast.
It's packed full of comic shit too, with references to Man Thing, Beta Ray Bill, and Bi Beast, a tie in appearance from Doctor Strange, the first appearance of Surtur, and Hulk rampaging through Asgard. It has relentlessly entertaining set pieces and an 80s synth style soundtrack that tops everything wonderfully.
Not much to complain about here - easily the best of the Thor trilogy and a solid entry into the wider MCU.

