The Vampire Diaries
8.1
Rate It
TV Show Watch
A few months after their parents are killed in a tragic car accident, Elena Gilbert and her brother,...
Kim Pook (101 KP) rated Love Hard (2021) in Movies
Jul 31, 2022
Despite the predictable outcome of the movie, I really enjoyed it. Nina dobrev is fab and plays a really likeable character who is also pretty funny, and Jimmy o. Yang who plays Josh fits well with Ninas character too as the awkward shy guy, who just wants to find love. This has definitely been added as one of my fav Xmas movies.
The Ripper (The Vampire Diaries: Stefan's Diaries #4)
8.2
Rate It
Book
The fourth book in the New York Times bestselling series by L.J. Smith. The Ripper is the fourth...
Origins (The Vampire Diaries: Stefan's Diaries, #1)
6.6
Rate It
Book
About the Book The first book in the New York Times bestselling series by L.J. Smith. ...
The Asylum (The Vampire Diaries: Stefan's Diaries #5)
5.0
Rate It
Book
The fifth book in the New York Times bestselling series by L.J. Smith. The Asylum is the fifth book...
The Compelled (The Vampire Diaries: Stefan's Diaries #6)
3.6
Rate It
Book
The sixth book in the New York Times bestselling series by L.J. Smith. The Compelled is the sixth...
Sarah (126 KP) rated Flatliners (2017) in Movies
Jul 14, 2018
I can kind of "get" the idea of a remake or a "reboot", given the progress in technology and medical science in the space of almost 30 years, so to bring a more contemporary feel for a modern audience would make sense to some extent. Instead, a film that was really thought provoking was turned into something that felt like, in parts, Final Destination.
A couple of lines tied the new version to the old, as well as Keifer Sutherland - one of the original cast of medical students - plays the part of a "House"-type doctor teaching the "Flatliners" in the new version.
The casting wasn't ideal - for instance, James Norton's American accent is kind of concerning. If he was a must-have for the film, couldn't his part have been as an international student?! Nina Dobrev played Elena from The Vampire Diaries in a lab coat. Similarly, the characters were a bit flat and one-dimensional. For instance, Ray used to be a firefighter. Great, where are we going with that? Oh, right, it never gets mentioned again!
Strangely, a lot of the film feels very rushed, with no real development of the stories of the individual characters or of how they go about the actual flatlining itself, while simultaneously feeling like very little of note actually happens.
Honestly, although the original is going to feel a little dated now, watch that instead of this. I feel like I want my money back - and we watched it on TV...
The Craving (The Vampire Diaries: Stefan's Diaries #3)
7.5
Rate It
Book
The third book in the New York Times bestselling series by L.J. Smith. The Craving is the third...
Bob Mann (459 KP) rated Flatliners (2017) in Movies
Sep 29, 2021
But the concept was sufficiently enticing – who isn’t a little bit intrigued by the question of “what’s beyond”? – that Cross Creek Pictures thought it worthy of dusting off and giving it another outing in pursuit of dirty lucre. But unfortunately this offering adds little to the property’s reputation.
In this version, the lead role is headed up by Ellen Page (“Inception”) who is a great actress… too good for this stuff. Also in that category is Diego Luna, who really made an impact in “Rogue One” but here has little to work with in terms of backstory. The remaining three doctors – Nina Dobrev as “the sexy one”; James Norton (“War and Peace”) as “the posh boy” and Kiersey Clemons as the “cute but repressed one”, all have even less backstory and struggle to make a great impact.
Still struggling to get the high score on Angry Birds: from left to right Ray (Diego Luna), Sophia (Kiersey Clemons), Marlo (Nina Dobrev), Courtney (Ellen Page) and Jamie (James Norton).
Also putting in an appearance, as the one link from the original film, is Kiefer Sutherland as a senior member of the teaching staff. But he’s not playing the same character (that WOULD have been a bloody miracle!) and although Sutherland adds gravitas he really is given criminally little to do. What was director Niels Arden Oplev (“The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”) thinking?
In terms of the story, it’s pretty much a re-hash of Peter Filardi’s original, with Ben Ripley (“Source Code”) adding a few minor tweaks to the screenplay to update it for the current generation. But I will levy the same criticism of this film as I levied at the recent Stephen King adaptation of “It”: for horror to work well it need to obey some decent ‘rules of physics’ and although most of the scenes work (since a lot of the “action” is sensibly based inside the character’s heads) there are the occasional linkages to the ‘real world’ that generate a “WTF???” response. A seemingly indestructible Mini car (which is also clearly untraceable by the police!) and a knife incident at the dockside are two cases in point.
Is there anything good to say about this film? Well, there are certainly a few tense moments that make the hairs on your neck at least start to stand to attention. But these are few and far between, amongst a sea of movie ‘meh’. It’s certainly not going to be the worst film I see this year, since at least I wasn’t completely bored for the two hours. But I won’t remember this one in a few weeks. As a summary in the form of a “Black Adder” quote, it’s all a bit like a broken pencil….. pointless.
Harper's BAZAAR Magazine US
Lifestyle and Magazines & Newspapers
App
SUBSCRIBE NOW AND GET YOUR FIRST ISSUE FREE! In our 150th Anniversary issue, The Weeknd explains...