
Fully Connected: Surviving and Thriving in an Age of Overload
Book
Twenty-five years after the arrival of the Internet, we are drowning in data and deadlines. Humans...
Law and Values in the European Union
Book
How has European Union developed since its origins in the reconstruction of Europe in the wake of...

The Acadian Diaspora: An Eighteenth-Century History
Book
Late in 1755, an army of British regulars and Massachusetts volunteers completed one of the...

Boom's Blues: Music, Journalism, and Friendship in Wartime
Book
Boom's Blues stands as both a remarkable biography of J. Frank G.Boom (1920-1953) and a recovery of...

The Joy of Insight
Book
In the 1930s, Victor Weisskopf worked with leading European physicists such as Niels Bohr, Werner...

Star Trek: Starfleet Command
Entertainment and Games
App Watch
You have the conn! Summon your skills in strategy, combat, diplomacy, and leadership to master the...

Operation Chastise: The RAF's Most Brilliant Attack of World War II
Book
The attack on Nazi Germany’s dams on May 17, 1943, was one of the most remarkable feats in...

Embrace the Magic (The Blood Rose #2)
Book
When a blood rose enters Mastyr Ethan’s world, will he succumb to his deepest needs or lose her...
Paranormal Romance

Two Necromancers, a Dragon, and a Vampire (The Unconventional Heroes #3)
Book
Two necromancers, a dragon, and a vampire – it sounds like a shortcut to disaster, and for Timmy,...

Bob Mann (459 KP) rated Churchill (2017) in Movies
Sep 29, 2021
I’m not a historian but am married to one, so know the importance of “sources” in the pursuit of “truth”: one man’s terrorist is after all another man’s freedom fighter from a different perspective. Some sources on the internet (here for example) certainly suggest the The British (led by Churchill as Prime Minister) might have sensibly promoted the acceleration of the Italian campaign to reach Berlin rather than the far riskier Channel crossing.
This film however paints Churchill as a man demonised by his decision to send young men to their deaths in the fateful Gallipoli beach landings of World War One, with this – rather than a sensible strategic one – being the primary reason for opposing the Normandy landings. To further paint him as a bumbling old fool that is “worked around” by his peers strikes you as borderline libellous.
So the film’s script, by novice Alex von Tunzelmann, immediately set the wrong tone with me, and the undeniably strong performances of Brian Cox (“The Bourne Identity”) as Churchill and the wonderful Miranda Richardson (“Harry Potter” and the soon to be released “Stronger”) as Clemmie can’t fill the gap.
Besides anything else, diretor Jonathan Teplitzky (“The Railway Man”) delivers a piece so dull and lifeless, and with so much brooding, that its not remotely enjoyable. You think the introduction of a bullied secretary – Ms Garrett (Ella Purnell) – with a strong personal connection to ‘Overlord’ will add dramatic colour? But this angle too seems to go nowhere in particular.
There are many tales of the Normandy landings that are fascinating, over and above the dramatic sweep of “The Longest Day” (which is surely well overdue for a remake?) and Spielberg’s fictionalisation of the Niland brothers in “Saving Private Ryan”. How about the 2 out of 29 American amphibious tanks that reached Omaha beach after ignoring British advice to not launch so far from shore in rough seas?
So, as a film, it might be “worthy”. But I didn’t remotely believe the depiction of Churchill and it astonished me that such a rivetingly exciting period of British history could deliver a film that bored me. So, sorry, can’t recommend this one. Perhaps Joe Wright will have a better go with Gary Oldman as Churchill in “Darkest Hour”…