Search
Search results

Frank Turner recommended It's All Crazy! It's All False! It's All A Dream! by mewithoutYou in Music (curated)

Simon Pegg recommended Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back (1980) in Movies (curated)

Adam Pally recommended Out of Sight (1998) in Movies (curated)

Lev Kalman recommended Unfaithfully Yours (1984) in Movies (curated)

Stephen Morris recommended No. 1 in Heaven by Sparks in Music (curated)

Awix (3310 KP) rated Ooh... You Are Awful (1972) in Movies
Sep 7, 2020
More lowest-common-denominator farce from the British film industry of yore. A con man who specialises in disguises, trying to locate the big score he and his dead partner made, must track down a group of women each of whom has vital clues to its whereabouts tattooed on her backside, while being pursued by the Mafia and London gangsters.
Nearly as horrendous as it sounds: some of these films make late-period Carry Ons look quite sophisticated. The plot takes a long time to get going and doesn't end up reaching anywhere worth the trip, despite the presence of various familiar faces from film and TV of the period. Has a weird sort of innocence to it despite all the smut, and Emery is a good enough comic to raise a few laughs even from material as thin and questionable as this. But, in general, oh dear.
Nearly as horrendous as it sounds: some of these films make late-period Carry Ons look quite sophisticated. The plot takes a long time to get going and doesn't end up reaching anywhere worth the trip, despite the presence of various familiar faces from film and TV of the period. Has a weird sort of innocence to it despite all the smut, and Emery is a good enough comic to raise a few laughs even from material as thin and questionable as this. But, in general, oh dear.

Awix (3310 KP) rated The Brood (1979) in Movies
Oct 24, 2020
Key Cronenberg movie starts off relatively restrained but ends up with a festival of bonkers ickiness. A man in the middle of a custody battle finds people connected to his ex-wife are being murdered by deformed child-like dwarves with weird, non-human anatomies. Can unorthodox psychiatrist Oliver Reed shed light on the situation?
Undeniably a horror movie, but one rich in subtext and metaphor, as well as containing several ew-that's-unbelievably-gross moments. (Students of the director may also wonder just how bad his divorce must have been.) Less Oliver Reed than you might hope for, but a remarkable performance from Samantha Eggar, and a great many memorable and disturbing sequences. Works on all sorts of levels, though some people may struggle to see past the more graphic aspects of the film. Still, this is horror done with brains and style.
Undeniably a horror movie, but one rich in subtext and metaphor, as well as containing several ew-that's-unbelievably-gross moments. (Students of the director may also wonder just how bad his divorce must have been.) Less Oliver Reed than you might hope for, but a remarkable performance from Samantha Eggar, and a great many memorable and disturbing sequences. Works on all sorts of levels, though some people may struggle to see past the more graphic aspects of the film. Still, this is horror done with brains and style.

saheffernan (157 KP) rated Wilder Girls in Books
Aug 20, 2019
I struggled with this review. This was one of my most anticipated books of the year and I just did not love it as I expected. However, the hype I built up for myself was probably a disservice to the book and in the end plays apart in my disappointment.
Overall, the book was an enjoyable read and I would still recommend it. The middle took a weird turn for me and never seemed to come back from that. I didn't like the ending although it does leave room for drawing your own conclusions. I also believe that some of the characters although your suppose to believe they are resourceful, cunning, smart seemed to believe things that they were told at face value and never investigated further. The writing was definitely able to pull me in and the story was entertaining enough to finish.
Overall, the book was an enjoyable read and I would still recommend it. The middle took a weird turn for me and never seemed to come back from that. I didn't like the ending although it does leave room for drawing your own conclusions. I also believe that some of the characters although your suppose to believe they are resourceful, cunning, smart seemed to believe things that they were told at face value and never investigated further. The writing was definitely able to pull me in and the story was entertaining enough to finish.
The premise of this book was completely interesting, industrial espionage. That portion of the book was written well, and moved at a good pace. Oftentimes, people aren't really exposed to the industrial espionage, which is vastly more interesting that the commonly known espionage. Stealing corn seed is probably not the first thing you think of when you think of espionage.
The absolute worst part of this book was the random entries about what the journalist was doing at the time. Sorry, it was no interesting, and the book suffered for it. Journalists do to this a lot, but it's usually minimal, ( @Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup ), or it's actually extremely important to the story, ( @Catch and Kill: Lies, Spies, and a Conspiracy to Protect Predators ). Her life was definitely not interesting enough for me to read about (sorry, not sorry).
The absolute worst part of this book was the random entries about what the journalist was doing at the time. Sorry, it was no interesting, and the book suffered for it. Journalists do to this a lot, but it's usually minimal, ( @Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup ), or it's actually extremely important to the story, ( @Catch and Kill: Lies, Spies, and a Conspiracy to Protect Predators ). Her life was definitely not interesting enough for me to read about (sorry, not sorry).